Publications

(2022). The structure, prevalence, and nature of mass belief systems. The Cambridge Handbook of Political Psychology, pp. 89.

(2022). The Political Landscape of the US Twitterverse. Political Communication, pp. 1–31.

(2022). The nature of affective polarization: Disentangling policy disagreement from partisan identity. American Journal of Political Science, (66), 3, pp. 775–790.

(2022). Reply to: Local news in Google News. Nature Human Behaviour, pp. 1–3.

(2022). Negative partisanship is not more prevalent than positive partisanship. Nature Human Behaviour, pp. 1–13.

(2022). Measuring dynamic media bias. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, (119), 32, pp. e2202197119.

(2022). Censorship on social media: The gatekeeping functions of shadowbans in the American Twitterverse. Available at SSRN.

(2022). Beyond anonymity: Network affordances, under deindividuation, improve social media discussion quality. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, (27), 1, pp. zmab019.

(2021). What Do We Mean by Negative Partisanship?. The Forum, (19), 3, pp. 481–497, https://doi.org/doi:10.1515/for-2021-2027.

PDF

(2021). The nonlinear feedback dynamics of asymmetric political polarization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, (118), 50, pp. e2102149118.

(2021). Reconsidering the link between self-reported personality traits and political preferences. American Political Science Review, (115), 4, pp. 1482–1498.

(2021). Questionable and open research practices: attitudes and perceptions among quantitative communication researchers. Journal of Communication, (71), 5, pp. 715–738.

(2021). Policing the Digital Divide: Institutional Gate-keeping & Criminalizing Digital Inclusion. Journal of Communication, (71), 4, pp. 572–597.

(2021). Link recommendation algorithms and dynamics of polarization in online social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, (118), 50, pp. e2102141118.

(2021). Interindividual cooperation mediated by partisanship complicates Madison’s cure for “mischiefs of faction”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, (118), 50, pp. e2102148118.

(2020). Who is Open to Authoritarian Governance within Western Democracies?. Perspectives on Politics.

PDF

(2020). National news outlets are favored overlocal news outlets in news aggregator results. Nature Human Behavior.

PDF

(2019). The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, (22), 7, pp. 1–35.

PDF

(2019). Projecting Confidence: How the Probabilistic Horse Race Confuses and Demobilizes the Public. Journal of Politics, pp. 1–38, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3117054.

PDF

(2019). Brevity is the Soul of Twitter: The Constraint Affordance and Political Discussion. Journal of Communication, https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz023.

PDF

(2019). Are There Still Limits on Partisan Prejudice ?. Public Opinion Quarterly.

PDF

(2018). Race of Interviewer Effects in Telephone Surveys Preceding the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, June, https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edy005.

PDF

(2018). Policy over party: comparing the effects of candidate ideology and party on affective polarization. Political Science Research and Methods, (19104), pp. 1–17, https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2019.18.

PDF

(2018). Don't expose yourself: Discretionary exposure to political information. Oxford.

PDF

(2018). Affective Polarization and Ideological Sorting : A Reciprocal , Albeit Weak , Relationship Affective Polarization : Identity or Ideology ?. The Forum: A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics, (16), 1, pp. 67–79, https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2018-0005.

PDF

(2017). The Hostile Audience: The Effect of Access to Broadband Internet on Partisan Affect. American Journal of Political Science, (61), 1, pp. 5–20, https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12237.

PDF

(2017). Selective Exposure to Balanced Content and Evidence Type: The Case of Issue and Non-Issue Publics about Climate Change and Health Care. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, (94), 3, pp. 833–861, https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016654681.

PDF

(2017). Rethinking the rigidity of the right model: Three suboptimal methodological practices and their implications. 1st ed.: Psychology Press.

(2017). Linking Survey and Media Content Data: Opportunities, Considerations, and Pitfalls. Communication Methods and Measures, (11), 4, pp. 221–244, https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1380175.

PDF

(2017). Are Cultural and Economic Conservatism Positively Correlated? A Large-Scale Cross-National Test. British Journal of Political Science, pp. 1–25, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123417000072.

PDF

(2016). The Limits of Partisan Prejudice. The Journal of Politics, (79), 2, pp. 485–501, https://doi.org/10.1086/688223.

PDF

(2016). The Ideological Asymmetry of the American Party System. British Journal of Political Science, (46), 4, pp. 825–844, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123414000404.

PDF

(2016). Mass polarization: Manifestations and measurements. Public Opinion Quarterly, (80), Specialissue1, pp. 392–410, https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw005.

PDF

(2016). Democratic Like Us? Political Orientation and the Effect of Making Democracy Salient on Anti-Israel Attitude. Journal of Experimental Political Science, (3), 1, pp. 97–107, https://doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2015.13.

PDF

(2016). Binding Moral Foundations and the Narrowing of Ideological Conflict to the Traditional Morality Domain. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, (42), 9, pp. 1243–1257, https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216653936.

PDF

(2014). Do needs for security and certainty predict cultural and economic conservatism? A cross-national analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, (106), 6, pp. 1031–1051, https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036170.

PDF

(2012). The association of religiosity and political conservatism: The role of political engagement. Political Psychology, (33), 2, pp. 275–299, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00875.x.

PDF

(2012). How Christians reconcile their personal political views and the teachings of their faith: Projection as a means of dissonance reduction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, (109), 10, pp. 3616–3622, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1117557109.

PDF

(2012). Complete anonymity compromises the accuracy of self-reports. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, (48), 6, pp. 1291–1299, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.07.002.

PDF

(2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, (76), 3, pp. 405–431, https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs038.

PDF

(2009). Determinants of turnout and candidate choice in the 2008 U.S. presidential election: Illuminating the impact of racial prejudice and other considerations. Public Opinion Quarterly, (73), 5, pp. 943–994, https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfp079.

PDF